Your point is valid, and yet the way you present it is unproductive.

What you mean, as I understand it, is that those ideologies you call "Woke" (and I all social justice activism) generally engage in an Americo-centric narrative, written by Americans for Americans.

And yes, you're right. When we say "white privilege," we mean white American privilege. Even more specifically, we might mean "white descendants of American slavers."

When we say "slavery," we mean the specific inhumane practice of intergenerational chattel slavery created by the Atlantic trilateral trade and perpetuated by slave-breeding farms in Jamaica, South Carolina and other places in the Americas.

It's a conversation Americans are having with Americans. But it's also influencing South American thought, with many embracing these paradigms to affect social change in their own regions. And it's influencing Asian thought, in regions where the Chinese have been the privileged, and the Laotians, Cambodian, Philippine are the marginalized ones.

Yes, the way we are conducting the dialog on social justice here in America could benefit from a little globalist thinking. But I fear that your contentious title and dismissive prose about the "woke" do nothing but empower and embolden the racist American, the fascist American, the sexist American - rather than invite them to understand the rest of the world.